Philippine legal intelligence
Ingest the record. Read what is actually there. Build the case — audits, court drafts, evidence maps and tactical strategy grounded strictly in real Philippine law and Supreme Court jurisprudence.
No invented G.R. numbers. Every authority is linked to a free public source with LawPhil and Chan Robles fallbacks.
Ingestion, analysis and drafting run automatically the moment your files land. Each output explains itself in plain language before it gives you the citations.
Drop PDFs, PNGs, JPGs, whole folders, batches, or capture straight from your camera. Dual-engine switch between Cloud OCR + Vision AI and offline Tesseract, with a normalisation pipeline tuned for PaddleOCR, Surya and Tesseract output.
The moment a document lands, it is identified, parties are mapped, facts are put on a dated timeline, and every procedural or evidentiary defect on the face of the record is flagged.
A filing-ready Philippine pleading skeleton: caption, prefatory statement, statement of facts traced to quoted passages, issues, arguments, prayer, and verification.
Evidence necessary to support the case for BOTH sides — what it proves, its admissibility basis, custodian, how to obtain it, and the risk if it never arrives.
Timeline, chain of custody, alternative narrative, witness credibility, and prosecutorial omissions — each with a defense strategy and a prosecution counter.
Ask anything about the ingested record, or fire one of 60+ preset prompt templates across adversarial testing, drafting, due diligence, discovery, compliance, SWOT and proofreading.
One file ingestion costs 2 credits. Two files cost 4 credits, and so on — camera captures included.
10
credits
Free on sign-up
≈ 5 file ingestions
100
credits
Php 1,000
≈ 50 file ingestions
1,000
credits
Php 10,000
≈ 500 file ingestions
To top up or extend usage, text or call Leandro Lucero at +639217337373.
The engine is instructed to rely strictly on real Philippine legal frameworks and genuine Supreme Court jurisprudence. It must never synthesize, exaggerate, guess or hallucinate laws, G.R. numbers or statutory articles. Where certainty is absent, it states the doctrine in words and marks it for verification instead of inventing a citation — and every output ends with a verification checklist.